poweredarticle.com
Search:    Index Page >> About Us >> Privacy >> Terms of Use >> Place Your Link >> Add Your Article   

Finance & Investment

Self Help

Hotels & Travel

Fitness & Health

Employment & Careers

Business & Companies

Fashion & Relationships

Estate & Realty

Research & Science

Drink & Food

Vehicles & Automotive

Issues & News

Recreation

Healthcare & Treatment

Computers & Software

Art & Creative

Government & Politics

Academics & Education

Sports & Adventure

Online Shopping

Online & Board Games

Family & Home

Society & Communities

Teens & Children

 

Index Page –› Issues & News –› Spirituality & Religion
 

Bishop Ussher's Dates: No Proof Of A Young Earth

 
For hundreds of years Christians have appealed to the dates formulated by the 17th century bishop, James Ussher. Using biblical genealogies from Genesis 5 and 11, and other supporting Biblical passages, he pieced together a timeline for Biblical events. Many Bibles have this timeline in the margins, indicating the estimated year that the events on that page occurred.

Many people still swear by these dates, especially the one indicated for Genesis Chapter One, 4,004 B.C. Many young-earth creationists claim that the creation week started in this year. Is it a reliable assumption that 4,004 B.C. is the beginning point for the earth? How did Ussher arrive at the 4,004 date?

Ussher and Old-Earth Belief

Ussher took a known point in Biblical history, namely, the fall of Jerusalem in 588 B.C. Counting back from there, with the Bible??s genealogies and the known number of years that these people lived, he simply added up the dates to get back to the 4,004 B.C. date for Adam??s birthday.

If you are an old-earth believer, there is no need to lose any sleep over Ussher and his dates, because his dates have no impact upon the events of the creation week. This is because his dates, if you choose to believe them, confirm the year of Adam??s creation. Adam??s creation was the last event of God??s creation, the crowning achievement of God??s creation, at the end of Day Six. Ussher??s methods of calculation does not go beyond Adam??s creation, because the genealogies he used stop with Adam, so they do not accurately account for the first five days of creation, nor to they account for most of Day Six.

Ussher claims that 23 October 4004 BC is the date of the creation of the world. While Ussher does add the six 24-hour days for the creation to his calculations, we have ample evidence today to show that the days of creation were long periods of time. All we can say for certain, if you believe Ussher, is that Adam was created on 28 October 4004 BC, which is Ussher??s sixth day of creation.

Therefore, it is possible to fully believe in Ussher??s dates, and also believe that the days of creation were billions of years long. The only thing to ignore is the six literal days he adds, which we know were not 24-hour days.

Many old-earth creationists, including the most prominent one today, Dr. Hugh Ross, have criticized Ussher??s dates, in an attempt to discredit them and give support to their own old-earth theories. They incorrectly claim that Ussher??s dates are inconsistent with the evidence from geology. However, all that is inconsistent is Ussher??s addition of the 24-hour days of creation. They are mistaken in the belief that Ussher??s dates threaten old-earth belief. Again, since Ussher??s dates are based on genealogies, they only go back to the creation of Adam, and have no impact upon the preceding events of God??s creation, which were billions of years long.

Conclusion

Ussher has almost reached the point of sainthood among fundamental Baptist believers. His dates have long been used as proof of a young earth. However, they have nothing to do with the length of God??s creation days, since his method only goes back to the beginning of Adam??s life. Young-earth creationists have no basis for arguing the age of the earth based on Ussher??s dates. Old-earth creationists can even believe in the dates if they wish. If Ussher had been an old-earth creationist, his dates would have been the same, except for the six added 24-hour days of creation. The bottom line??Ussher has no impact upon the age of the earth debate, and does not support a young earth.

This article comes from the Answers In Creation website (http://www.answersincreation.org). The source article is located at http://www.answersincreation.org/ussher.htm.

Author: Greg Neyman
 
Author Bio:

Greg Neyman is the founder of the website ministry Answers In Creation. The original location of this article is at www.answersincreation.org/question.htm.

 
 
 

Related Articles

 
Ding Dong - Jesus
 
Fruit of the Spirit
 
Is the Seventh day really the Sabbath?
 
Hinduism- Shakti's Importance
 
Black Swan - Grace Under Pressure
 
Church Staff: Are You Ready for the Holidays?
 
Why Can't The Theories of Evolution And Creationism Co-Exist?
 
Prayer Is The Best Thing!
 
The Frog In The Pot: Complacency costing us our rights, our families, our souls
 
Handling Yourself At Your Motor Vehicle Accident Scene
 
 
 

Related Links

 
USDiners.com -- Next Generation Restaurant Marketing
Spending too much on traditional advertising? Join USDiners.com-The next generation restaurant marketing. We will drive the customers from the Internet to your restaurant. Cost-effective.
 
Accommodation Scotland Directory
Independent directory of bed and breakfast, self catering and hotels in the West of Scotland.
 
Zen Scripts
Book Rome Hotels, B&B, apartments and residences.
 
Barcode Scanners
Barcode Scanners POS Systems and more at great prices. Visit our Barcode Scanner online superstore now.
 
Cartridges Ink
The best source to find the Cheapest Cartridges Prices.
 
Hindi News from Express Media Service
Express media service is satellite based hindi news agency, offers hindi news service to newspapers and magazines. news can be viewed or download news for later viewing.
 
 
 
 

It's Time Once Again for..."From Time to Time"

From time to time I share with my readers some of the reasons (there are about 10,000 of them and gr ... - Douglas Bower and Cindi Bower
 

Transitional Fossils

Transitional fossils, or the supposed lack thereof, has been used for many years by anti-evolutionis ... - Greg Neyman
 

Fruit of the Spirit

Have you ever been around someone that seems to ooze the fruit of the spirit? You can see love, joy, ... - Phyllis Ward
 

Understanding What Revival Really Is

Religion is just the work of man. Everyone has some sort of religion or rules they live by, but this ... - David Cooper
 

In the Eyes of the Future

As a child at school, I once told a friend, as we looked down the road; ?Our future is down there, w ... - Anthony Smith
 

Four Prophetic Pillars That Mark Where We Are Right Now ?C The Timing of the Second Coming of Christ

No one knows when the second coming of Christ will be exactly. But there is a generation that should ... - 123456789
 
 
Index Page >> Privacy >> Terms of Use  
© www.poweredarticle.com - All Rights Reserved Worldwide